Larson, et al. v. Allina Health System, et al.
Allina ERISA Settlement
Case no. 0:17-cv-03835-SRN-TRL

Frequently Asked Questions


Expand/Collapse All
  • You or someone in your family may have been a participant in or a beneficiary of the Plans during the Class Period, during which time your Plan account included investments in any of the Plans’ investment options.  The Court directed that the Notice be sent to you because if you fall within the definition of the Settlement Class, you have a right to know about the Settlement and the options available to you regarding the Settlement before the Court decides whether to approve the Settlement.  If the Court approves the Settlement, and after any objections and appeals are resolved, the Net Proceeds will be distributed to the Settlement Class members according to a Court-approved Plan of Allocation described in Question 7.  The Notice describes the Action, the Settlement, your legal rights, what benefits are available, who is eligible for them, and how to get them.

  • The Action claims that under ERISA, the Defendants owed fiduciary duties of loyalty, care, and prudence to the Plans and that they violated those duties in connection with the selection and monitoring of the Plans’ investment options.  During the Class Period, participants in the Plans were able to allocate their account balances among various investment funds.  Named Plaintiffs allege that as jumbo plans, the Plans had substantial bargaining power regarding the fees and expenses that were charged against participants’ investments.  Defendants, however, did not try to reduce the Plans’ expenses or exercise appropriate judgment to scrutinize each investment option that was offered in the Plans to ensure it was prudent.  Instead, Defendants abdicated their fiduciary oversight, allowing the Plans’ trustee, Fidelity, to lard the Plans with high-cost, non-Fidelity mutual funds through which Fidelity received millions of dollars in revenue sharing payments, while also giving Fidelity discretion to add any Fidelity mutual fund that Fidelity had available, regardless of whether the funds were duplicative of other options, had high costs, were performing poorly, or were otherwise inappropriate as retirement savings options for the Plans’ participants. 


    Defendants deny all of the claims and allegations made in the Action and deny that they ever engaged in any wrongful conduct.  If the Action were to continue, the Defendants would raise numerous defenses to liability, including: 

    • Defendants did not engage in any of the allegedly improper conduct charged in the Complaint;
    • Defendants were not fiduciaries of the Plan, or if they were fiduciaries, their fiduciary duties did not extend to the matters at issue in the Action;
    • To the extent that they were fiduciaries as to the matters at issue in the Action, Defendants fully and prudently discharged all of their fiduciary duties under ERISA; 
    • Even if a court were to determine that Defendants failed to discharge any duty under ERISA, any such breach of fiduciary duty did not cause the Plans or its participants to suffer any loss.


    Class Counsel have extensively investigated the allegations in the Action.  Among other efforts, Class Counsel reviewed Plan-governing documents and materials, communications with Plan participants, U.S. Department of Labor filings, press releases, public statements, news articles and other publications, and other documents regarding the matters that the Named Plaintiffs allege in the Complaint.  This Action was litigated by the Named Plaintiffs and Class Counsel for nearly two years before the Parties agreed on settlement terms.  The Complaint in this matter was filed against Defendants on August 18, 2017, by Named Plaintiffs.  Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint on December 15, 2017 that was denied in part, and granted in part by the Court on October 1, 2018.  Defendants filed an answer to the Complaint on November 29, 2018.  The parties thereafter held a planning meeting to discuss, among other things, the nature and basis of the Parties’ claims and defenses, issues about preserving discoverable information, and a proposed discovery plan.  The Parties then submitted a joint report regarding the meeting to the Court on January 2, 2019.  The Court then held a conference on January 8, 2019 to discuss the contents of the Parties’ joint plan and to set a schedule for litigating this Action.  Following the conference the Parties engaged in preliminary settlement discussions, which as discussed below, ulitimately led to the resolution of this Action. 


    The proposed Settlement is the product of hard-fought, lengthy negotiations between Class Counsel and the Defendants’ counsel.  Over the course of several months, the Parties negotiated via several telephonic conferences and numerous email exchanges.  Following arm’s-length negotiations, on April 5, 2019, Named Plaintiffs and Defendants, through their respective attorneys, reached an agreement to settle the Action on behalf of all participants in or beneficiaries of the Plan (except Defendants and their Immediate Family Members), at any time during the Class Period and who maintained a balance of any amount in the Plans during that time period.  

  • In a class action, one or more plaintiffs, called “class representatives” or “named plaintiffs,” sue on behalf of people who have similar claims.  All of these people who have similar claims collectively make up the “class” and are referred to individually as “class members.”  One case resolves the issues for all class members together.  Because the wrongful conduct alleged in this Action is claimed to have affected a large group of people – participants in the Plans during the Class Period – in a similar way, the Named Plaintiffs filed this case as a class action.

  • As in any litigation, all parties face an uncertain outcome.  On the one hand, continuation of the case against the Defendants could result in a judgment greater than this Settlement.  On the other hand, continuing the case could result in no recovery at all or in a recovery that is less than the amount of the Settlement.  Based on these factors, the Named Plaintiffs and Class Counsel have concluded that the proposed Settlement is in the best interests of all Settlement Class members.

  • You are a member of the Settlement Class if you fall within the definition of the Settlement Class preliminarily approved by Judge Susan Richard Nelson:

    All participants and beneficiaries (excluding Defendants and their Immediate Family Members) of the Allina Health System (“Allina”) 403(b) Retirement Savings Plan and the Allina 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan  at any time between August 18, 2011 and November 21, 2019.

    If you are a member of the Settlement Class, the amount of money you will receive, if any, will depend upon the Plan of Allocation, described in Question 7.

  • A Settlement Fund consisting of $2,425,000 is being established in the Action.  The amount of money that will be allocated among members of the Settlement Class, after the payment of any taxes and Court-approved costs, fees, and expenses, including attorneys’ fees and expenses of Class Counsel, any Court-approved Case Contribution Awards to be paid to the Named Plaintiffs, and payment of expenses incurred in calculating the Settlement payments and administering the Settlement, is called the Net Proceeds.  The amount of the Net Proceeds will not be known until these amounts are quantified and deducted.  The Net Proceeds will be allocated to members of the Settlement Class according to a Plan of Allocation to be approved by the Court.  The Plan of Allocation describes how Settlement payments will be distributed to Settlement Class members who receive a payment.

    If the Settlement is approved by the Court, all Settlement Class members and anyone claiming through them shall be deemed to fully release the Released Parties from Released Claims.  The Released Parties include Defendants (including Allina) and any Person who served as a trustee or fiduciary of any kind of the Plans (including functional fiduciaries), together with, for each of the foregoing: any predecessors, Successors-In-Interest, present and former Representatives, direct or indirect parents, subsidiaries and affiliates, and any Person that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with any of the foregoing.  Released Claims are defined in the Settlement Agreement and include all claims that were or could have been asserted in the Action.  This means that Settlement Class members will not have the right to sue the Released Parties for failure to prudently select and monitor the Plans’ investment options or related matters that occurred during the Class Period.

    The above description of the proposed Settlement is only a summary.  The complete terms, including the definitions of the Released Parties and Released Claims, are set forth in the Settlement Agreement (including its exhibits).

  • Your share (if any) of the Net Proceeds will depend on your alleged loss, compared to other Settlement Class members’ alleged losses, during the Class Period.  Each Settlement Class member’s share will be calculated according to a Court-approved Plan of Allocation by a third-party vendor (“Settlement Administrator”) selected by Class Counsel with Defendants’ approval.  Because the Settlement Amount and Net Proceeds are less than the total losses alleged by the Settlement Class, each Settlement Class member’s portion of the Settlement Amount will be less than his or her alleged losses.  You are not required to calculate the amount you may be entitled to receive under the Settlement as the Settlement Administrator will do so under the Plan of Allocation.  In general, your proportionate share of the Settlement will be calculated as follows:

    • First, the Settlement Administrator will obtain balances for each Settlement Class member in their Plan accounts as of August 18,  2011 (or as close thereto as practicable) and as of December 31, 2011, and on December 31 of each subsequent year of the Class Period up to and including 2018.  For 2019, the Agreement Execution Date will be used.  The Settlement Class members’ Plan account balance, calculated as the sum of each Settlement Class member’s balance in their Plan accounts, at each such time will be known as the “Annual Account Balance.”
    • Second, the Net Proceeds will be allocated by calculating the sum of all Annual Account Balances for each year of the Class Period and then allocating each Settlement Class member a share of the Net Proceeds in proportion to the sum of that Settlement Class member’s Annual Account Balance, where the numerator is the Settlement Class member’s Annual Account Balances and the denominator is the total of all Settlement Class member’s Annual Account Balances.
    • Settlement Class members who are entitled to a distribution of less than $10.00 will receive a distribution of $10.00.  Settlement Class members’ awards falling below $10.00, will be progressively increased to $10.00 from the Net Proceeds and the Net Proceeds will be re-allocated until the lowest participating Settlement Class member award is $10.00.  This modified award shall be known as the Class Member’s Entitlement Amount.

    You will not be required to produce records that show your Plan activity.  If you are entitled to a share of the Settlement Fund, your share of the Settlement will be determined based on the Plans’ records for your account.  If you have questions regarding the allocation of the Net Proceeds, please contact Class Counsel.

  • You do not need to file a claim.  Although the Entitlement Amount is determined based on Settlement Class members’ account balances in both the Allina 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan and Allina 403(b) Retirement Savings Plan, the Entitlement Amount for Settlement Class members with an active account (an account with a positive balance) at the time of distribution will be paid into the Allina 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.  That is because the Allina 403(b) Retirement Savings Plan has been frozen since October 2010, and as of January 1, 2012, all eligible Allina employees became participants in the Allina 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan.

    For Former Participants whose Settlement Class member Entitlement Award as calculated by the Settlement Administrator is determined to be Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) or more, such Former Particpant will have the opportunity to elect a tax-qualified rollover of his or her settlement payment to an individual retirement account or other eligible employer plan, which he or she has identified on a form to be provided by the Settlement Administrator, provided that the qualified Former Participant supplies adequate information to the Settlement Administrator to effect the rollover.  If  such Former Participant does not elect a rollover, or elects a rollover but fails to provide adequate information, the Former Participant will receive his or her settlement payment by check in the same maner as Former Participants with Class Member Entitlement Awards less than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) as described below.

    For Former Participants whose Final Dollar Recovery is determined to be less than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00), they shall be paid directly by the Settlement Administrator.  Checks issued to Former Participants pursuant to this paragraph shall be valid for 180 days from the date of issue. If you are a former Plan participant and have not provided the Plans with your current address, please contact Class Counsel listed on Page 2 above.  All payments under the Plan of Allocation are intended to be “restorative payments” in accordance with Internal Revenue Service Revnue Ruling 2002-45.

  • Settlement checks to former participants were mailed on March 5, 2021. Settlement awards were posted to active participants’ accounts on June 9, 2021.

  • You do not have the right to exclude yourself from the Settlement.  The Settlement Agreement provides for certification of the Settlement Class as a non-opt-out class action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(1), and the Court has preliminarily determined that the requirements of that rule have been satisfied.  Thus, it is not possible for any Settlement Class Members to exclude themselves from the Settlement.  As a Settlement Class member, you will be bound by any judgments or orders that are entered in the Action for all claims that were or could have been asserted in the Action or are otherwise released under the Settlement.

    Although you cannot opt out of the Settlement, you can object to the Settlement and ask the Court not to approve it.  For more information on how to object to the Settlement, see the answer to Question 13.

  • The Court has preliminarily appointed the law firms of Kessler Topaz Meltzer & Check LLP, Bailey & Glasser LLP, Izard Kindall & Raabe LLP, and Nichols Kaster, PLLP as Class Counsel for the Named Plaintiffs in the Action.  You will not be charged directly by these lawyers.  If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense.

  • Class Counsel will file a motion for the award of attorneys’ fees of not more than one third (33 1/3%) of the Settlement Amount ($808,252.50), plus reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with the prosecution of the Action up to a maximum of $50,000.00.  This motion will be considered at the Fairness Hearing described in Question 13.


    By following the procedures described in the answer to Question 13, you can tell the Court that you do not agree with the fees and expenses the attorneys intend to seek and ask the Court to deny their motion or limit the award.

  • The deadline to object to the Settlement was March 16, 2020 and has passed.

  • The Court held a Fairness Hearing to decide whether to approve the Settlement as fair, reasonable, and adequate. It was your obligation to ensure that your written objection was filed with the Court by no later than March 16, 2020. The deadline to object to the Settlement has passed.

  • The Fairness Hearing was scheduled for May 22, 2020, and the Court granted final approval of the Settlement on the same day.

  • No, but you are welcome to attend at your own expense.  If you filed an objection, you do not have to attend the Hearing to talk about it.  As long as you mailed your written objection on time, it will be before the Court when the Court considers whether to approve the Settlement.  You also may pay your own lawyer to attend the Fairness Hearing, but such attendance is also not necessary.

  • If you submitted a written objection to the Court and counsel before the Court-approved deadline, you may (but do not have to) attend the Fairness Hearing and present your objections to the Court.  You may attend the Fairness Hearing even if you do not file a written objection, but you will only be allowed to speak at the Fairness Hearing if you filed a written objection in advance of the Fairness Hearing AND you filed a Notice of Intention To Appear. The deadline to file a Notice of Intention to Appear was March 30, 2020 and has now passed. 

  • If you do nothing and you are a Settlement Class member, you will participate in the Settlement of the Action as described in the Notice.

  • Yes.  The Notice summarizes the proposed Settlement.  The complete terms are set forth in the Settlement Agreement.  You may obtain a copy of the Settlement Agreement by making a written request to Class Counsel, by calling the toll-free number, 1-855-961-0951, or by sending an email to  You are encouraged to read the complete Settlement Agreement.


For More Information

Visit this website often to get the most up-to-date information.


Allina ERISA Settlement
c/o JND Legal Administration
PO Box 91334
Seattle, WA 98111